@inproceedings {Simula.simula.2810,
	title = {Performance Evaluation of Congestion Window Validation for DASH Transport},
	journal = {Proceeding of the 24th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {ACM},
	type = {Annual},
	abstract = {A recent proposed update to TCP congestion control, TCP-newCWV, has targeted congestion control for rate-limited applications. These methods need to be explored in the context of rate-adaptive applications, such as DASH. The new method enables a client to exploit the persistence of a DASH connection and enables the DASH server to rapidly resume transmission of a series of video segments using a single TCP connection. Another technique, called {\textquoteright}Pacing{\textquoteright} smoothes DASH bursts when there is no TCP ACK clock, and is shown to significantly reduce burst loss. These two methods in combination can increase the application performance. This paper investigates the effect of implementing these techniques on a DASH flow in different congestion scenarios and whether the method can promote better capacity sharing while minimizing the latency experienced by other flows sharing a common network bottleneck. The results confirm that newCWV with Pacing provides a benefit as a platform for DASH transport.},
	doi = {10.1145/2578260.2578275},
	author = {Nazir, Sajid and Hossain, Ziaul and Secchi, Raffaello and Broadbent, Matthew and Petlund, Andreas and Fairhurst, Gorry},
	editor = {Wei Tsang {Ooi}}
}
@inproceedings {Simula.SE.215,
	title = {Judgment-Updating Among Software Professionals},
	journal = {The 2nd international conference on software knowledge information management and applications (SKIMA)},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {62-67},
	publisher = {SKIMA conference organising committee},
	type = {Conference},
	abstract = {Initial judgments related to key decisions in software projects are often based on one-sided or misleading information. The initial assessment of the benefits of introducing a new development tool may for example be based a vendor{\textquoteright}s sales demonstration or a reference client{\textquoteright}s favorable description. In this paper we study software professionals{\textquoteright} abilities to adjust their early, biased judgments when receiving contradicting or less biased information. The first study, involving 160 software professionals, found a strong under-adjustment for the impact of misleading information and one-sided argument. A follow-up two weeks later found that this under-adjustment was not removed over time. The second study, involving 65 software professionals, found that the ability to update biased judgments may sometimes be quite good, but that it is hard to predict when. A practical consequence of our results is that software professionals should strongly emphasize the avoidance of biased and potentially misleading information and not trust that they are able to adjust their judgments and beliefs when more reliable and unbiased information are available.},
	isbn = {9781851432516},
	author = {J{\o}rgensen, Magne and Grimstad, Stein},
	editor = {Hossain, Ziaul and Ouzrout, }
}
