@inproceedings {Simula.approve.24,
	title = {A Comprehensive Characterization of NLP Techniques for Identifying Equivalent Requirements},
	journal = {International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {ACM},
	type = {Conference},
	abstract = {[Context] Though very important in software engineering, linking artifacts of the same type (clone detection) or of different types (traceability recovery) is extremely tedious, error-prone and requires significant effort. Past research focused on supporting analysts with mechanisms based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) to identify candidate links. Because a plethora of NLP techniques exists, and their performances vary among contexts, it is important to characterize them according to the provided level of support. [Objective] The aim of this paper is to characterize a comprehensive set of NLP techniques according to the provided level of support to the human analyst in detecting equivalent requirements. [Method] The characterization consists on a case study, featuring real requirements, in the context of an Italian company in the defense and aerospace domain. [Results] The major result from the case study is that simple NLP are more precise than complex ones.},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-0039-1},
	author = {Falessi, Davide and Cantone, Giovanni and Canfora, Gerardo},
	editor = {Succi, Giancarlo and Morisio, Maurizio and Nagappan, Nachi}
}
