@inbook {Karahasanovic.2006.1,
	title = {Challenges of Learning Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Through a Modelling-First Approach},
	booktitle = {Comprehensive Object-Oriented Learning. The Learner{\textquoteright}s Perspective},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {49-66},
	publisher = {Informing Science Press},
	organization = {Informing Science Press},
	chapter = {4},
	address = {California, USA},
	isbn = {83-922337-4-3},
	author = {Karahasanovic, Amela and Holmboe, C.},
	editor = {Fjuk, A. and Kaasb{\o}ll, J.}
}
@inbook {Kaasboll.2006.1,
	title = {Improvements of Teaching and Tools for Learning Object-Orientation},
	booktitle = {Comprehensive Object-Oriented Learning: The Learner{\textquoteright}s Perspective},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {205-220},
	publisher = {Informing Science Press},
	organization = {Informing Science Press},
	chapter = {11},
	address = {California, USA},
	isbn = {83-922337-4-3},
	author = {Kaasb{\o}ll, Jens and Fjuk, A. and Karahasanovic, Amela and Groven, A-K},
	editor = {Karahasanovic A. {Fjuk} and Kaasb{\o}ll, J.}
}
@inbook {Karahasanovic.2006.2,
	title = {Revealing Object-Oriented Comprehension by Feedback Collection},
	booktitle = {Comprehensive Object-Oriented Learning. The Learner{\textquoteright}s Perspective},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {111-130},
	publisher = {Informing Science Press},
	organization = {Informing Science Press},
	chapter = {7},
	address = {California, USA},
	isbn = {83-922337-4-3},
	author = {Karahasanovic, Amela and Fjuk, A. and Sj{\o}berg, Dag Ingar Kondrup and Thomas, R.},
	editor = {Fjuk, A. and Kaasb{\o}ll, J.}
}
@inproceedings {SE.5.Karahasanovic.2004,
	title = {A Controlled Experiment to Evaluate the Reactivity and Usefulness of the Think-Aloud Tool},
	journal = {Information Resources Management Association International Conference (IRMA{\textquoteright}04), Human Computer Interaction Track},
	year = {2004},
	month = {May 23-26},
	pages = {1033-1034},
	publisher = {Idea Group Publishing},
	type = {1},
	address = {New Orleans, Louisiana, USA},
	abstract = {This paper presents ongoing work on the evaluation of a tool for collecting feedback in large-scale software engineering and program comprehension experiments. Two most important questions one can ask about a new verbal procedure are whether it is useful and whether it is reactive. We have developed a tool, called the think-aloud tool, to support the think-aloud method in a variety of experiments. This tool instructs the subjects at regular intervals to write down their thoughts on a web based screen, as opposed to the oral expression of thoughts in conventional think-aloud method. The tool collects the subjects\&$\#$39; feedback together with timestamps. This paper describes an experiment designed to investigate whether the think-aloud tool affects performance of the subjects and whether it collects information beyond that collected in traditional think-aloud and retrospective reports. Furthermore, we will conduct a qualitative comparison of mouse and keying rates with think-aloud and retrospective reports. In addition, the experiment aims to check for any effect from using the think-aloud tool on the subject\&$\#$39;s task-related understanding and problem solving.},
	author = {Karahasanovic, Amela and Fjuk, A. and Sj{\o}berg, Dag Ingar Kondrup and Thomas, R.}
}
